In snowy regions like the Henry’s Fork, the amount of water held in the snowpack on April 1st can help predict summer streamflow. But over the past two decades, the relationship between the water stored in spring snowpack and summer streamflow has changed, making summer streamflow less predictable. New research by HFF and Idaho State University scientists show how we can improve our summer streamflow predictions by better understanding when snowmelt and rain enter the ground relative to the forest growing season.
Key Takeaways:
The amount of snow that becomes streamflow depends on both past and current conditions.
Predicting streamflow requires accounting for changing forest dynamics.
Less snowmelt becomes streamflow after years when more water enters the soil during the forest growing season.
Why is it important to be able to accurately predict water supply?
Part 1 discussed how warmer temperatures and changing forest dynamics are contributing to water supply decline in the Henry’s Fork. At the Henry’s Fork Foundation, if we want to reduce drawdown of Island Park Reservoir and increase winter flows to grow more trout, we need to be able to accurately predict water supply. Understanding watershed processes are key for those predictions—but these processes are changing and impacting the quality of HFF’s predictions.
How do watershed processes impact water supply predictions?
Created by Sarah Newcomb
Since the severe drought of the early 2000s, less water from spring snowpack is turning into streamflow, leading traditional approaches to over-predict summer streamflow. This poses the risk of us going into the summer thinking we have more water than we actually do. Predicting this change presents a new challenge, since most approaches do not account for changes in forest cover or evapotranspiration (ET; how much water evaporates or is used by plants).
Precipitation becomes streamflow more effectively when incoming snowmelt and rainwater exceeds demand (potential evapotranspiration or PET). Potential evapotranspiration, or PET, simply has to do with how much water would evaporate if there was no limit to how much water was available. In the Henry’s Fork, high snowmelt and springtime rain lead to peak water inputs in the late spring. Demand (PET) has historically been lower during the early spring months. As a result, streamflow is higher during spring months when supply is high, and demand is low. We call this the ‘recharge period,’ because snowmelt and rain are recharging or adding more water to the system than is being taken out by ET. Changes to the recharge period will affect how much water becomes streamflow.
Changes in the recharge period can be due to:
Snow melting later
Snow melting slower (which results in fewer days where inputs are greater than outputs).
Warmer springtime temperatures (leading to earlier increases in PET) during the start of the growing season
What has HFF’s research shown?
To better understand the impact of a changing recharge period, HFF research presented a new unit of measurement, which we call the Vegetation-Water Alignment Index (VWA). The VWA calculates how water supply aligns with the growing season. The VWA helps us identify:
The recharge period
Changes in when and how quickly snow melts
Changes in forest vegetation
The length of the recharge period
Created by Sarah Newcomb
We found that streamflow is lower after years when more water entered the ground during the forest growing season (smaller recharge period) instead of before the growing season. Since the VWA provides us with information about future streamflow, it can be used to help us improve our streamflow predictions from year-to-year.
One reason predicting streamflow is challenging is due to the limited information known on April 1st, when most summer predictions are made. When applied to the major tributaries of the Henry’s Fork, the Vegetation-Water Alignment metric improved summer streamflow predictions in each subwatershed. Specifically, we found that water input and growing season alignment is particularly important in the low-elevation forests surrounding Island Park.
In this blog post, we 1) present our turbidity and suspended sediment data, 2) explain our suspended load calculations, and 3) provide some additional information justifying why we think that a substantial amount of bed load was transported into the Henry’s Fork in addition to the suspended load. Since first observing high turbidity in Thurmon Creek and the Henry’s Fork downstream associated with the Silver Lake drawdown in November 2025, HFF’s Science and Technology team
Written by Doris Squeri Tom and I met on our first day of grad school back in 1982. We were both broke and stressed, and we both loved the outdoors, so I decided that an affordable way to relieve some of that stress might be to learn how to fly-fish. We had learned to fish with our dads when we were very small, but it was bait fishing, and we wanted to try something new.
The Henry’s Fork Drought Management Planning Committee (DMPC) met on Monday, November 24 to set this winter’s outflow and reservoir-fill strategy for Island Park Reservoir—an annual decision with implications for winter trout habitat in Box Canyon and the Ranch. Winter Outflow: What’s Coming on December 1 Beginning December 1, outflow from Island Park Dam will increase, bringing winter streamflow through Box Canyon to ~380 cfs from December through February*. That equates to 76% of Box
The Henry’s Fork Foundation (HFF) has become aware of, and is actively investigating, the recent draining of Silver Lake in Harriman State Park. The sudden draining of the lake released a large amount of fine sediment downstream into Thurmon Creek and the Third Channel of the Henry’s Fork through the Ranch. Although HFF was not informed the lake would be drained, our science team responded immediately, documenting conditions, collecting samples, and assessing the river as
