Changes to Lower River Management Benefit Upper River

Home » Blog » Changes to Lower River Management Benefit Upper River

Highlights:

  • The lower river between St. Anthony and Parker is an important summer management lever for Island Park Reservoir. The Drought Management Planning Committee (DMPC) aims to send water downstream in a way that meets irrigation demand and keeps flow above certain target.
  • On-river research by HFF’s Christina Morrisett and Rob Van Kirk identified changing the target to 350 cfs at Parker would benefit lower river and upper river needs for farms and fish. DMPC adopted new target in 2020.
  • This new target has benefited kokanee salmon and rainbow trout recruitment in the upper river, as well as saved water in Island Park Reservoir!

photo of water running under a bridge crossingbridge over riverbridge over mostly dried up riverbed

The Lower River Lever

The “lower Henry’s Fork” means a lot of things to a lot people. Some folks think of the lower river as anything downstream of Mesa Falls. For others, the lower river refers to the reach between Ashton and Fun Farm. For watershed management, the lower Henry’s Fork is even further downstream: St. Anthony to Parker (Red Road Bridge).

Why care about the lower Henry’s Fork? Well, if you can believe it, it’s a major lever for how the Henry’s Fork Drought Management Planning Committee (DMPC) approaches summertime management of Island Park Reservoir. The lower Henry’s Fork is home to four major irrigation canals that can divert up to 800 cfs during peak summer demand, usually in mid-July. To make sure the river meets irrigation demand while also leaving enough flow to keep the river wet for fish, the DMPC recommends that an “irrigation-season streamflow target” guide drawdown (or draft) of Island Park Reservoir. So, if you’re fishing in the Box or on the Ranch in the summer and wondering why flow is what it is—it’s likely to meet the downstream target to satisfy both farms and fish.

You may know of this target as “1000 cfs at St. Anthony.” And, it was. The DMPC was established in 2003 and used the “1000 cfs at St. Anthony” rule through 2019. This 1000-cfs target was created using formal stakeholder input and was placed at the USGS streamflow gage at St. Anthony. This gage sends data to a website where it is available in real-time at 15-minute intervals. That’s incredibly helpful—and convenient—for real-time management of Island Park Reservoir upstream.

But the 2016 drought highlighted how impactful this lower Henry’s Fork target is. Keeping the lower river wet came at the expense of saving water in Island Park Reservoir. And we’ve learned just how important those water savings can be (ex. kokanee salmon fishery, water quality, winter flow). So, I was brought on as a PhD student in Fall 2018 to figure out: How low can we go? Or, more scientifically: What should the lower river target actually be?

A blue arrow moves from right to left, with St. Anthony marked on the right and Parker on the left. Light blue arrows are placed on the main arrow, pointing out to indicate water being diverted from the river by canals. From right to left those canals are Egin, St. Anthony Union Feeder, Independent Canal, and Consolidated Farmers. There is a dashed line upstream of Consolidated Farmers to note where the Railroad Trestle is.Line illustration of lower Henry’s Fork. Flow moves downstream from St. Anthony to Parker (~7 miles). EG = Egin Canal, AF = St. Anthony Union Feeder Canal, IN = Independent Canal, CF = Consolidated Farmers Canal

On the River Research

I got on the river in Summer 2019 and floated Cemetery to Railroad and Railroad to Parker 2-3 times per week. It quickly became apparent that 1000 cfs at St. Anthony was not cutting it. This streamflow target, while convenient, did not account for the diversions immediately downstream. In fact, Rob, an intern, and I measured a 219 cfs streamflow at Parker—downstream of all diversions—on July 16. It was shocking, to say the least, but incredibly informative. Thankfully, we never saw flows that low again. But as the summer continued, we noticed a change in river character when flows downstream of Railroad (Trestle) fell below 350 cfs. Colgate intern, Ashly Loibman, documented cool groundwater springs in the reach (more here) and we noticed that we lost connectivity to these springs below 350 cfs as well. A feeling isn’t quite enough, so Rob did the math and found that 1) changing the target to 350 cfs and 2) moving it downstream to Parker wouldn’t really change Island Park management too much. The same volume of water would likely be sent downstream, but the timing of its distribution would change.

So—using HFF’s science-based, collaborative management approach—we pitched it to the DMPC. We pitched changing the target from 1000 cfs at St. Anthony to 350 cfs at Parker to account for diversions. The DMPC agreed to try it on a trial basis in 2020. But since there isn’t a streamflow gage at Parker, calculating flow in real-time isn’t super convenient. So Melissa Muradian (HFF Water Quality Data Consultant) created a website that retrieves USGS streamflow data at St. Anthony and USBR data on downstream diversions to show real-time and predicted flow at Parker. No bookmarked webpages or calculators needed!

A graph showing streamflow through time (Sep 29 through Oct 9) for three locations on the Henry's Fork (St. Anthony, Trestle, and Parker) relative to the 350 cfs target.Screenshot of the lower Henry’s Fork streamflow website created by Melissa Muradian, HFF Water Quality Data Consultant

Research Impact

The 350 cfs target at Parker has been the default operating strategy since 2020. In the lower river, this new target has minimized summer flow variability, provided more stable summer habitat for fish, and maintained connectivity to groundwater streams that provide cool water to the river during high temperatures. It has also contributed to water savings in Island Park, increasing end-of-season reservoir storage by 1,226 acre-ft in 2020 and 2,400 acre-ft in 2021—two below average water years!

These water savings:

  • Allowed earlier fill of Island Park Reservoir
  • Increased the kokanee fishery upstream of Island Park Reservoir (3.3% in 2020 and 6.5% in 2021)
  • Increased Box Canyon trout recruitment (+5 cfs winter flow and 30 Rainbow Trout in 2020; +10 cfs winter flow and 60 Rainbow Trout in 2021)
  • Benefited water quality

Stay tuned for some ~behind the scenes~ action on what the 2019-2021 fieldwork looked like for this endeavor. But in the meantime, I would like to thank Fremont-Madison Irrigation District for lending HFF an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) to measure streamflow, as well as the many staff, interns, and volunteers who helped me collect the data needed to make this streamflow target recommendation.

 

This work was funded by the Local Highway Technical Assistance Council, Fremont County Idaho, a U.S. Bureau of Reclamation WaterSMART Applied Science Grant, National Science Foundation grant no. 1633675, and the Henry’s Fork Foundation. Field technicians were supported by the Admiral James Green Scholarship at Colgate University (2019 recipient: Ashly Loibman), the Don C. Byers Memorial Scholarship through the Henry’s Fork Foundation (2020 recipient: Margaret Ruebush), and an internship fund at St. Lawrence University (2021 recipient: Erik Sauer).

Facebook
LinkedIn
Pinterest

Recent Posts

General
Jasper Davis

FAQ: Island Park Reservoir Fall 2026 Strategy

This year has brought the Henry’s Fork watershed an extraordinary water-supply challenge. Natural flow is exceptionally low, and Island Park Reservoir is ending the summer at a near-record low level. But there is another important part of this story: we knew these conditions were coming, we planned for them, and water managers are managing the water we have as carefully as possible. HFF is one of the 6 official signatories to the Henry’s Fork Drought

Read More »
Frequently Asked Questions
Jasper Davis

Island Park Reservoir Current Conditions (9/4/26)

Why is Island Park Reservoir getting so low? Simply put, this has been an exceptionally low-water year. There isn’t enough natural flow to meet all of the basin’s needs without drawing down reservoirs. Water managers are working together to deliver water that is legally owed downstream while preserving as much as possible for next year. What should anglers expect below Island Park Dam? As Island Park Reservoir drops too low for the hydropower plant to

Read More »
Water Quality
Christina Morrisett

September 2026 Water Quality Forecast for Island Park

Photo of Island Park Reservoir taken Friday, August 28, 2026 The ingredients for green algae blooms, the primary culprit for turbid water in Island Park, stacked up one after the other earlier this spring. Warm air temperatures. Low streamflow. Long, sunny days. And an ice-free reservoir 30 days earlier than normal. At the Henry’s Fork Foundation, where we swim in water data daily, we braced ourselves for the water quality worst-case scenario: another summer with

Read More »
Frequently Asked Questions
Christina Morrisett

FAQ: Island Park Reservoir Water Quality

Island Park Reservoir on June 24, 2026 Questions answered in this article: Why are Island Park Reservoir levels so low this year? Is Island Park Reservoir hyper-eutrophic? Are silt and sediment building up behind the dam?   Island Park Reservoir is the center of the Henry’s Fork universe. Reservoir water quality and quantity shape our fisheries, and your fishing experience. But after a warm winter and lower-than-average snowfall, we’ve received a lot of questions about

Read More »