Rain Vs. Snow [Part 2]

Home » Blog » Rain Vs. Snow [Part 2]
Snowy river with trees

This is the second installment of a five-part series investigating the various effects of receiving more precipitation as rain versus snow in the Henry’s Fork watershed. This installment was originally included in a daily water report sent March 5, 2024.

The big takeaway:

Today’s message is simple: when snow makes up a larger fraction of total precipitation, prediction of irrigation-season water supply is more precise.

The details:

One of the fundamental characteristics of water management in mountainous regions of the western U.S. is our ability to precisely predict water supply for the upcoming summer irrigation season. This high degree of predictability—historically, at least—is inherited from the dominance of summer-time streamflow by snowmelt. When peak snow water equivalent (SWE) occurs in April, the summer’s water supply is just sitting there on the ground, where we can easily measure it and therefore predict streamflow for the upcoming 6 months. Prediction of runoff timing is a little trickier, but traditionally, we have been able to predict total volume pretty well.

In extensive modeling of streamflow in the subwatersheds of the Henry’s Fork, Dr. Christina Morrisett found that in looking backwards at total summertime streamflow with complete data in hand, streamflow is best predicted by models that contain both SWE and summertime precipitation as inputs, along with some other climatic variables. However, in early April, when we need to predict water supply for irrigation and other needs for the upcoming summer, we do not know how much it is going to rain during the spring and summer and so need to predict streamflow only with SWE and other predictors that are known at the beginning of April.

It turns out that in water years in which SWE makes up a larger fraction of total precipitation, these models are more precise in predicting upcoming summer streamflow. In the 1989–2023 data set, the median fraction of precipitation accumulated in peak snowpack is 77%. For years with greater-than-median snow fraction, peak SWE explains 89% of the variability in upcoming April–September streamflow. For years with less-than-median snow fraction, peak SWE explains only 73% of variability in April–September streamflow. For the data set as a whole, SWE explains 82% of the variability in streamflow. Thus, as rain makes up a larger fraction of total precipitation, the precision in predicting streamflow from peak SWE goes down. The graph below shows that the scatter of points around the prediction curve is lower in the years with higher snow fraction.

One obvious observation from the graph (and from intuition) is that when the snow fraction is lower (rain fraction is higher), total streamflow is a little higher. More rain in the spring and summer will generally increase streamflow a little bit relative to what it would have been based on snowpack alone. So, if in those rainy years we end up with a little more water than expected, what is the harm in that?

The answer has two parts. First, early-spring predictions are used by water managers to inform irrigators of their likely water supply, prior to planting. Agricultural producers make key decisions based on the anticipated water supply, and deviations from that supply in either direction can result in less-than-optimal cropping decisions. Second, early-spring predictions are critical to determining basin-wide springtime reservoir operations to balance multiple objectives. Having more water than expected because of spring rain usually results in less predictable reservoir operations, which are not optimal for water users, anglers, or hydropower operators. Anglers can readily understand this, as unexpected flow changes at Palisades Dam or Island Park Dam in the spring and early summer can disrupt fishing conditions during desirable hatches.

With respect to Island Park Reservoir in particular, when trying to maximize storage in the spring, runoff from a big rain must be passed through a full reservoir, requiring increased outflow. On the other hand, leaving room in the reservoir to capture that runoff risks losing some storage if rain doesn’t materialize, to the long-term detriment of both water users and fisheries. As I mentioned yesterday—and as is apparent from today’s graphic—the years with higher rainfall fractions are the years of lower water supply, when predictions and reservoir operations are most critical to optimizing water use. As rain makes up a larger fraction of precipitation, more precise management will be even more critical to make limited supply go farther, at the same time that our ability to predict supply and implement more careful management decreases.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Pinterest

Recent Posts

An aerial view of Island Park Dam. The reservoir sits behind it and the river flows below it.
Water Quality
Christina Morrisett

Summer 2026 Water Quality Forecast for Island Park

This article was originally published in Island Park News on May 29, 2026 Ice melted on Island Park Reservoir on March 31, 2026—four weeks earlier than normal and the earliest the Henry’s Fork Foundation (HFF) has observed in 12 years of monitoring. Such an early ice melt was not unexpected given the region’s near-record warm and dry winter. But ice melting a month early has implications for water quality in Island Park Reservoir and the

Read More »
Aerial photo of Island Park Reservoir. The dam is in the bottom left corner. The Centennial Mountain Range is in the top.
Water Quality
Christina Morrisett

History of Water Quality in Island Park Reservoir

Warmer and drier conditions have slowly degraded water quality in Island Park Reservoir over the last 50 years.  In the 1970s and 1980s, federal reports and university research indicate that the reservoir had relatively good water quality. Island Park Reservoir was mesotrophic—with mostly clear water and occasionally low dissolved oxygen at the reservoir’s deepest depths during the summertime. But, as time went on, water quality began to decline. Historical satellite imagery analyzed by the U.S.

Read More »
A photo taken of Island Park Reservoir while standing on the dam and looking north. The sky is cloudy, Mt Sawtelle sits with little snow in the background, and the reservoir is open water (save for a few small sheets of ice in the distance).
Water Quality
Christina Morrisett

Reservoir Ices Off, Growing Season Turns On

Photo of an ice-free Island Park Reservoir taken on March 31, 2026 On March 31, 2026, with no accompanying commentary, HFF scientist Christina Morrisett stood on top of Island Park Dam and texted colleagues Rob Van Kirk and Jack McLaren photos of open water on Island Park Reservoir. Rob, eager to see that the reservoir reality matched what he was seeing in the real-time river data downstream, texted back, “Yep! That’s close enough to ice

Read More »
Photo of confluence of Warm River and Henry's Fork
Water Quality
Rob Van Kirk

Water Supply and Water Quality Predictions for Summer 2026

The photo above captures the unprecedented situation we face at the beginning of April. The photo, of the confluence of Warm River and the Henry’s Fork, was taken on February 7 and shows the shocking lack of snow we experienced in the watershed all winter as a result of record-breaking warm temperatures. How will the warm winter and lack of snow affect water supply, water quantity, and fisheries? The highlights are below. If you want

Read More »